Cinderellas Challenge Blue Bloods in March Madness

Have a little chat...or even a Tiny one..

Tiny chat is a a virtual chat room! The idea of the old school chat room has been blended with the new-age webcam craze and Voila! Tiny Chat is born. I joined the chat site just to see what it was all about and was amazed at the growing interest it is drawing in. There are millions chatting virtually at this very minute and they're just a simple click away. There are three levels of chat you may join; the first being a simple membership allowing you to publicly view others while chatting, next a more private chat ( both of these are absolutely Free!) and third is a Premium membership which has a monthly cost of $20.00. Tiny chat has many web-based applications available on www.tinychat.com such as: 

• Live Video Groups                                                           
• Private 2-way calling
• Chats linked to Facebook and Myspace
• Newly added Video Conferencing
• Screen Sharing

I read post and blogs online of people who had heard of, or used Tiny Chat. I came up with mixed feelings until I used the site myself. I'm not a big chat room fan, but after using the site I felt more at ease with the idea. People are often close-minded about things they have deemed as risky or unsafe. Chat rooms have always been something I've avoided for that reason. People might stalk me..or hack me...concerns that everyone secretly has. Tiny Chat seems cool. I haven't visited the site since my initial visit but I'm not sure I would not visit again.

Sites used as references:

http://tinychat.com/

http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/27/virtual-chat-room-tinychat-adds-video-conferencing-and-screen-sharing/

-Life Changes-

Who will take care of me when I'm old? 

This is the question that haunts my thoughts lately. To catch you up to speed-- I am 21 years old. I am a college student, I live at home, and I have Endometriosis. I have been told that a hysterectomy is my only option. I am not a candidate for ulterior treatments.Again, I am only 21 years old.

I looked up hysterectomy online-
"A hysterectomy (from Greek ὑστέρα hystera "womb" and εκτομία ektomia "a cutting out of") is the surgical removal of the uterus, usually performed by a gynecologist. Hysterectomy may be total (removing the body, fundus, and cervix of the uterus; often called "complete") or partial (removal of the uterine body but leaving the cervical stump, also called "supracervical"). It is the most commonly performed gynecological surgical procedure. In 2003, over 600,000 hysterectomies were performed in the United States alone, of which over 90% were performed for benign conditions.Such rates being highest in the industrialized world has led to the major controversy that hysterectomies are being largely performed for unwarranted and unnecessary reasons" (wikipedia.org, 2003).


My parents are siding with the doctors. I seem to be alone in the belief that having children is more important than feeling well all the time. I'm told I'm being "selfish"....but I'm sure that if I made the choice to give up kids and heal myself, then I would feel selfish in the truest sense.


This is a random post...not related to school or New Media. However, it is important to me. This is an issue  that has the ability to change everything about the rest of my life. I just thought I'd like to share my thoughts and see if anyone else had anything to say about the advice that is being given by doctors currently. With all the medical advances that are being made...with all of the technology being made available....nothing can help me? Am I supposed to so readily accept the fate they're trying to hand me?

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hysterectomy

Bloggers Beware of Bashing Big Timers

               Bloggers Beware of Bashing Big Timers

by: Maegan Hensley

                From what I've read Liskula Cohen is searching for justice something akin to finding a needle in a haystack. The story in a nutshell, goes something like this: Liskula Cohen is a Vogue model who has been in the media with unrelated drama previously. An anonymous blogger posted a personal opinion within a personal blog and mud was thrown. I found one particular article on http://www.nydaileynews.com/ very interesting pertaining to this case. Writer Jose Martinez depicted the scene as an all out battle between a vicious model and her unadoring "fan". This article claims that bashing comments like "skank" and "hag" were used by the blogger to describe the model. Cohen took  such offense to this "bash blog", she hired lawyers to lean on the Google corporation in order to reveal the hater-girl's identity.
                        " The defamation suit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, seeks a court order compelling Google and its Blogger.com service to identify whoever led the vicious Internet assault against Cohen" (Martinez, Staff Reporter).
            
           Although this occurence would surely be unsettling to a model, or anyone for that matter; it is unrealistic, in my opinion, to chase after the ones who seek to hurt you with their words. It is wrong to be the kind of person who dwells on the fortune of others and chooses to use painful and demeaning ways to degrade complete strangers. The reality though, is that those people exist. They are there regardless of what is right and what is wrong; regardless of morals and scruples, they will still be entitled to their opinions. The very best lawyers could present the most convincing case against this anonymous blogger and still...no matter what he or she posted...it is her right to speak, type, scream, sing and yes, even Blog her opinion. While I don't agree with the kind of action behind creating blogs for the sole purpose to degrading another person, I cannot help but feel like there are greater, more eminent crimes being committed at the present. Google should not have had to give up the identity of the blogger who put her trust in that company's claim to stand behind her site, the day she signed up. Rosemary Port was named as the blogger bashing Liskula Cohen. Port has filed a case herself against Google for defiling her rights to privacy. And so..the endless cycle goes..
            
             To Liskula - I'm sorry that this has happened to you. No one likes to hear negative things about themselves, whether they hold truth or not. However, by attaching yourself to this case so directly, demanding the cooperation Blogger and Google, you are asking that they jeopardize the privacy contracts in  which their entire corporation depend on. the opinion of one person should not matter so entirely that you cannot live with yourself without bringing her down. What's that old saying?.... "That's show biz". You're not the first or last person in the media with a fan club drinking hater-ade.


* This report, excluding one sited quote, is written completely in my own words. It is a report that was written after reading numerous articles and blogs about the Liskula Cohen case. It is written in a personal fashion that flows like my thoughts tend to. The information about the case is introduced and my drawn conclusions and opinions follow. The websites I used in reference were:


http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/08/23/2009-08-23_outted_blogger_rosemary_port_blames_model_liskula_cohen_for_skank_stink.html

http://commonlaw.findlaw.com/2009/01/liskula-cohen-not-a-skank-google-sued-over-anonymous-blog.html

http://www.huliq.com/1/75587/liskula-cohens-lawsuit-vs-google-over-skanks-nyc-blog

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/170437/liskula_cohen_a_model_hero_in_google_lawsuit_win.html